Showing posts with label morphological awareness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label morphological awareness. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 8, 2025

Announcement


Announcement! Hot off the press! The root CRED (to trust, to believe) and its morphological derivatives illustrate the cover of the newly published 3rd edition of Vocabulary Through Morphemes: Suffixes, Prefixes, and Roots for Intermediate and Secondary Grades, student book (Ebbers, 2025). This is published by Silvereye Learning Resources .

Established in 1992, Silvereye Learning Resources is the best place in Australia to find resources to help those with learning difficulties, special needs, and various emotional and developmental challenges. Check them out! Silvereye can ship orders overseas from their US and UK distribution centers so buyers in the USA, Canada, and Great Britain will only pay local freight. 


This curriculum is a boost for vocabulary as well as reading and spelling. It begins with an overview of the English language, followed by a quick lesson on compound word formation. The main body of the book explores suffixes, prefixes, and roots. Suffixes not only help us determine word class or grammatical function, they also shape the meaning of a word. For example, words ending with the suffix -ic are typically adjectives, often describing behavior or characteristics: angelic, heroic, manic, energetic, electric, etc. Likewise, words ending with the suffix -ary are often nouns, and these words often describe collections of similar things, as in statuary, library, dictionary, glossary, aviary, mortuary, etc.

The curriculum includes dozens of graphic organizers, word games, word-art, word building and sorting activities.  The modified Frayer chart is only one example.

The book has been in publication for almost 25 years. Happy.

Wednesday, June 19, 2024

Open the Floodgates with Morphosyntactic Awareness

Action! Language is wrapped around action. A single word -- a verb -- can stand alone as a complete sentence: "Go!"  

In what ways does vocabulary knowledge depend on understanding the basic functions of verbs, nouns, adjectives, adverbs? How does morphological knowledge intersect with knowledge of syntax, grammatical function, or word class? How does vocabulary knowledge, morphological knowledge, and syntactic knowledge support reading comprehension?

In an earlier post I discussed the morphophonemic characteristics of English words, applied to learning to read (see Thunder & Lightning). Today, I discuss another important aspect of literacy: the morphosyntactic nature of English words. Morphosyntactic knowledge has to do with morphology (word formation) and syntax. English words are morphosyntactic because their morphemes -bases, roots, affixes- convey meaning (that's the morph part) while the suffixes in particular convey grammatical information (the syntax part). The final suffix in a word usually conveys whether the word is classified as noun, verb, adjective, or adverb.  For a well-known example, most words ending in the suffix -ly are adverbs, as in quietly, sweetly, loudly...but that is only the beginning. Let's really open wide those metalinguistic floodgates, with the goal of improved comprehension. 💦

VERBS
Latin roots or bases are often verbs. The root COGN denotes the verb 'to know' as in recognize, cognition, incognito, etc.  RUPT conveys 'to burst or break' in words like rupture, eruption, interrupt, corrupt. Likewise, CRED denotes 'to trust, believe' as in credibility, credit, incredulous, etc. 

Psst...The root CRED and its morphological derivatives illustrate the cover of the upcoming 3rd edition of Vocabulary Through Morphemes (Ebbers, in press with Silvereye Learning Resources, who also holds limited copies of the Teacher's Edition).



NOUNS - especially abstract nouns:
When we affix the derivational suffix –ion to the end of a root or word, it generally becomes a noun, as seen when the verb act becomes the noun action. Words that end with the suffix –ion are often abstract nouns; they represent ideas, concepts, feelings, or a process. They are not usually concrete concepts, not easy to see or touch or illustrate. Examples: The root TRACT means ‘to pull’ and it becomes an abstract noun with the suffix -ion: traction, detraction, contraction (an exception is tractor, a concrete noun). Similarly, the root FRACT means ‘to break’ as in the abstract nouns fraction, infraction, refraction. 

Morphological awareness (MA) helps us understand this transformation, at least at an intuitive level, if not with metalinguistic clarity. As we grow in MA, we begin to somewhat subconsciously realize that the invented word *taction would probably be a noun, something to do with the state or quality of showing tact, especially if we had some context to help: An effective diplomat must demonstrate *taction and discretion. 

On the other hand, if MA is not advancing, we may not grasp the noun-forming function of the suffix –ion. This is problematic for vocabulary development and for comprehension. Limited understanding of derivational-suffix morphology is evident in poor readers and writers as described in recent reviews of the literature (Levesque & Deacon; 2022; Liu, Groen, & Cain, 2024). Understanding the role of the suffix is key to understanding language. This becomes even more essential when reading informational texts, because derivational suffixes are ubiquitous to academic words. 

There are more than a dozen derivational suffixes and they all provide information about the word class, helping us decipher the syntactic property of the word. For example, words that end with –ize / -ise tend to be verbs, as in verbalize, fantasize, and exercise. Words that end with –ism tend to be abstract nouns, as in feudalism, pacifism, and capitalism. Words that end with –ive tend to be adjectives, as in creative, expansive, assertive, imaginative... 

The morphophonemic aspects of English words help us learn to read and spell, as discussed in Edview360. However,  morphosyntactic aspects help us understand the word and connect it with other concepts into meaningful sentences and passages. This is where the rubber hits the road for advancing beyond simple into complex texts (Castles, Rastle, & Nation, 2018).

Helping  students develop morphological awareness, including morphosyntactic awareness, is an important aspect of literacy, as discussed quite a bit more thoroughly in the three papers referenced below. 

Check back again next month! Stay tuned for some thoughts on helping students develop word consciousness or word sensitivity,  drawn from correspondence with the ever-curious Andy Biemiller.

Cheers,
Susan


REFERENCES:


Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51.  https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1529100618772271 


Levesque, K., & Deacon, S. (2022). Clarifying links to literacy: How does morphological awareness support children’s word reading development? Applied Psycholinguistics, 43(3), 921–943. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics/article/clarifying-links-to-literacy-how-does-morphological-awareness-support-childrens-word-reading-development/8BA65B23729527F2C3377E7AAF1CC0F9 


Liu, Y., Groen, M. A., & Cain, K. (2024). The association between morphological awareness and reading comprehension in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review.

Tuesday, May 21, 2024

Teaching Reading with Thunder and Lightning

English words are morphophonemic.  

morph + phon 

Let's break that down quickly. 


Phon: Phonemes are discrete sounds within a word such as /k/  /a/  /ch/ in catch.  When learning to read, children study phoneme-grapheme correspondence --the sound associated with a particular letter(s), such as in "a is for apple" as the old saying goes.

Morph: Morphemes are the smallest units of semantic or grammatical information in a language-- prefixes, suffixes, roots, and bases—the smallest meaning-bearing elements, the building blocks of vocabulary. Morphology is the study of word structure or word formation with morphemes -- prefixes, bases or roots, suffixes. Morphological awareness (MA) refers to “the ability to consciously consider and manipulate the smallest units of meaning in spoken and written language, including base words and affixes” (Apel, 2017). 

Some weeks ago in EdView360 I discussed the morphophonemic nature of English words and provided some implications for teaching children to read.  English -- like virtually every language to greater or lesser extent-- is based on morphophonemic word structure.  

If phonemes are thunder, then morphemes are lightning, and they both exist in English words. They both provide vital information to a child learning to read, or a fluent reader striving to comprehend a complex text.  Phoneme-grapheme correspondences are to be clearly taught so these associations are instantaneous and resound in the mind like thunder.  In keeping with this metaphor, morphemes are like lightning in that most of them are more visual, being larger chunkier units. These chunks must also be taught. In written words, morphemes can be colorful, placed in bold format, circled, highlighted, etc. 

mis spell ing     

un fashion able    

pre dict ion s


Morphology is a universal language component, a key aspect of the various human languages, along with phonology, semantics, syntax, and pragmatics. The English spelling system is morphophonemic, representing linguistic information about how to pronounce a word (phonemic) and how to determine its meaning and usage (morphemic).  When learning to read beyond the basic beginner stages, children will benefit from both phonics and morphology.

Many teachers capitalize on the morphophonemic nature of the English spelling system in literacy instruction, providing lessons in phonics/ phonemic awareness as well as in morphological awareness. Students who learn both phonics and morphology will hopefully be more likely to quickly access words via two routes: morphological make-up and phonological make-up (Levesque, Breadmore, & Deacon, 2021; Levesque & Deacon, 2022). Not only that, morphological knowledge is strongly associated with reading comprehension (Liu, Groen, & Cain, 2024).

In the Word Families activity below,  children reinforce what they have learned about specific phonetic and morphological units. They have been taught the phoneme-grapheme correspondence for ow (as in now) and ou (as in shout) and then they expand that knowledge further, into morphological word families with ou/ow patterns. In this image the learner has begun to color or highlight words that contain the same base with the same color. (Supercharged Readers curriculum, Voyager Sopris).


When the child has learned enough of the phonics code, while still in primary grades, begin to layer in lessons in word structure. This includes lessons in compound word structure as well as affixation. Teach children about suffixes and prefixes, beginning with the most common affixes. Help children begin to conceptualize words as part of a morphological family of related words, such as sun, sunning, sunned, suns, sunshine, sunny, sunniest, sunnier, sunshade, sunblock, etc.

Make the most of the morphophonemic attributes of the English language.

References 

Apel, K. (2017). Morphological Awareness Development and Assessment: What Do We Know? Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 43(2), 29–34. 

Levesque, K. C., Breadmore, H. L. , & Deacon, S. H. (2021).  How morphology impacts reading and spelling: Advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy development. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(1),10–26. 

Levesque, K., & Deacon, S. (2022). Clarifying links to literacy: How does morphological awareness support children’s word reading development? Applied Psycholinguistics, 43(3), 921–943. 

Liu, Y., Groen, M. A., & Cain, K. (2024). The association between morphological awareness and reading comprehension in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review.

Thursday, May 2, 2024

Thunder and Lightning and This and That

Greetings! Some news:

Today, EDVIEW360 published a brief article I wrote on the importance of integrating phonics and phonological awareness lessons with morphological awareness lessons when teaching children to read.  Based on growing evidence from empirical studies, I suggest beginning to teach morphological concepts at a younger age than previously thought. Begin in primary grades, after children learn basic closed-syllable  short-vowel phonics patterns, when children are learning to spell and read. Let's not wait until grade four, but rather plan lessons in first grade and beyond to dovetail orthography with morphology. Carpe diem!  See my article about this topic -- and many other good articles -- at EDVIEW360. 


Next week, Wednesday May 8 at 4pm Central Time, I will provide a webinar on these same topics. Sign up at EdView360 at this link:  Building Reading Skills in Grades 1-4









A few months ago, EDVIEW360 recorded my podcast on helping children learn to read. Listen to the podcast at Boosting Beginning Reading (and listen to other podcasts by many and varied experts in the field).

Plus, Silvereye Learning Resources is --even as we speak -- preparing to publish a new Third Edition of my morphology curriculum, Vocabulary Through Morphemes: Suffixes, Prefixes, and Roots for Intermediate and Secondary Grades. Cover art coming soon! I am pleased to announce that this curriculum has been in widespread use for more than two decades and will soon be back in publication again.

Also, Voyager Sopris Learning has recently (2024) published a new full-color Second Edition of my interactive decodable beginner books, Power Readers (K-2) and Supercharged Readers (more advanced decodable books).  The black-and-white first editions are also still available for purchase. The new edition of Supercharged Readers includes 5 additional chapter books with a greater focus on morphological knowledge. All the new books are now in color, with even more coaching tips provided in small font at the bottom of each page. To see samples or to order, go to  Power Readers and to Supercharged Readers.

Cheers to all,
Susan

Wednesday, April 22, 2020

Mindfulness, Madness, and Morphology



MINDFULNESS is a noun composed of three morphemes, mind + ful + ness. It is an abstract noun, a nebulous quality, a characteristic, a psychological state, and in some sense, an entity. Abstract, invisible, untouchable. But its presence within a group or an individual, and its lack, can feel quite concrete.
                 



According to Online Etymological Dictionary these concepts are not new. The word mindfulness has been in use for about five centuries and in the Buddhist sense for over a century. Mindless has been around six centuries or more. Note the Old English meaning ‘senseless, beside oneself, irrational, wanting power of thought.’ In terms of the plague, Europe would have known this state of mind.

The spread of covid 19 -- and the widely variable, rapidly changing information that surrounds it -- has spurred us to become more...or less...something. More vigilant. More reactive. More confused.  Also more compassionate, more courageous, more mindful.


Literacy Activities at Home or at School

1. Students -- or entire families -- could discuss the meaning of mindfulness and its counterpart, mindlessness. Evaluate current affairs and news reports as exemplifying mindfulness or mindlessness, somewhere between the two, or something else entirely. Discuss your reasons.

2. Draw up a list of synonyms and near-synonyms for each word. Try out the Visual Thesaurus website. To learn how, check out the post Beware the Obscure Adjective at Wordshop.

3. Become artful. Play with color, font size, and positioning. Create a word cloud from news articles on coronavirus, using text copied and pasted into Wordle or any cloud-maker. For more ideas on how to use word clouds, refer to a previous post on Word Clouds, Key Concepts and History. Some word cloud programs allow the words to fit into shapes.


MORPHOLOGY ACTIVITIES


Discuss the image Mind Full, or Mindful?  
What's the message? How does the morphological construction differ? How does the meaning differ?




Explore the morphology and etymology of mindfulness:

Explore the base mind and the suffixes -ful and -ness. Follow the links embedded in the text below and discuss the content and implications.

According to Online Etymology Dictionary, the word mind is a noun with its roots in Old English, Proto Germanic, and theoretically, it hails all the way back to one of the great ancestral mother tongue, ProtoIndoEuropean (PIE). The original meaning of of the concept was strongly associated with memory, remembering. Survival itself required a good memory.

mind: "that which feels, wills, and thinks; the intellect," late 12c., mynd, from Old English gemynd" memory, remembrance; state of being remembered; thought, purpose; conscious mind, intellect, intention" 

Discuss morphologically related words like mindset, minding, unmindful, mastermind, etc.

Utilize the Word Searcher website, created by Neil Ramsden. Notice the spelling sometimes differs from American English, as the author is based in Europe. Type mind into the Word Searcher field. Find 27 words that include that base. Discuss the meanings of these words.



Explore words ending with the suffix -ful

Type ful$ into the Word Searcher bar -- the suffix (ful) followed by the dollar sign $ to indicate placement at the end of the word.  I found 150 matches, including lawful, bagful, cupful, eyeful, baleful, needful, painful, gleeful, neglectful, disdainful, purposeful, teaspoonful. How are they alike and different? How could they be sorted into different groups?



Explore words ending with the suffix -ness

Utilize the Word Searcher website agin. Type ness$ into the search bar -- the suffix (ness) followed by the dollar sign $ to indicate placement at the end of the word. Notice again that the spelling sometimes differs from American English, as the author is based in Europe.

Try to decipher the meaning of previously unknown words by examining the morphological construction. For example, younger students might analyze and discuss shyness, goodness, grayness, wetness,  silliness, swiftness, heaviness, etc.  Note that most of the words generated through this search incorporate the suffix –ness, but a handful do not, as  in lioness and patroness (lion + ess and patron + ness). So, to deal with that, play Will the Real Suffix Please Stand Up, as described in The Descriptive Suffix -ish.

Older students might discuss the meaning and usage of academic words found by Word Searcher, including conspicuousness, coyness, aptness, flirtatiousness, inquisitiveness, meaninglessness, neighborliness. 


Explore words ending with both suffixes -ful and -ness:

Type fulness$ into the search bar.  Notice that the search engine only found 45 matches. Of those, some words are rarely used and may be unknown to the student but could be deciphered via morphological analysis and verified via the dictionary.

For example, consider three results: gratefulness, mournfulness, peacefulness. Of those three words, which one is easiest to decipher because the base is known and transparent? How does grate relate to  the concept of appreciation, anyway? Is this a grate over a duct or what? Discuss gratitude. And grace. Key ingredients to achieving mindfulness. And to living in the present.






Peace,
Susan

Thursday, November 10, 2016

Meta Meta Meta

Metacognitive, Metalinguistic, Metamorphological


The purpose of Vocabulogic is to help educators "bridge the verbal divide" that exists between those students who freely use language as a precision tool and those who do not, for whatever reason. 

The photo of the Golden Gate Bridge (The Tahoe Guy / CC) is a metaphor for spanning the language gulf. This gulf is deepened by variance in socioeconomic status, including exposure to books and academic language in the home (e.g. Corson, 1984; Hart & Risley, 1995).

Vocabulogic strives to promote literacy via word-reasoning skills, knowledge, and a keener-than-normal conscious awareness of language. Numerous experts have posted on a variety of pertinent topics, always with some connection to language and literacy goals. Articles posted here implicitly or explicitly accord value to metacognition as it relates to some aspect of metalinguistic awareness.

Berko, 1958
“Metalinguistic awareness is broadly defined as the ability to think about and reflect upon the nature and functions of language” (Pratt & Grieve, 1984, p. 2). This type of cognition involves conscious awareness of language as an object that one can examine, manipulate, and reflect upon.

Metalinguistic awareness encompasses far more than the ability to reflect on single words. It includes awareness of phonemes and syllables, graphemes and symbols, morphemes and meaning, phrases and sentences, grammar and syntax, context and definitions, homonyms, synonyms and antonyms, slang, dialect, and jargon, lexical ambiguities, riddles, and word play. It includes metaphor, imagery, personification, onomatopoeia, and rhyming. In sum, metalinguistic awareness encompasses all aspects of language (Nagy, 2007). Or at least, it can. If needed. If called upon.

Flavell (1981) suggests that metalinguistic awareness falls under the general rubric of metacognition, which subsumes metamemory, meta-attention, metalinguistics, etc., all of which allow us to exercise intellectual oversight while learning. Gombert (1992) grouped metalinguistic awareness into six subcategories of language: metaphonological, metasyntactic, metalexical, metasemantic, metapragmatic, and metatextual.

More recently -- and highly pertinent to Vocabulogic -- Duncan, Casalis, and Colé (2009) included another subcategory: metamorphological awareness of word structure. Their conception of metamorphological awareness overlaps with several of Gombert’s subcategories, but also gleans from the growing body of research focused on morphological awareness.

Metalinguistic awareness facilitates early literacy (Andrews, Yaden, & Templeton, 1986; Donaldson, 1978).  Zipke asserted, “Metalinguistic awareness, the ability to manipulate language independent of meaning, is an important ingredient in learning to read.” (2011, p. 349). Cain (2007) investigated the relations between word reading accuracy, reading comprehension and two measures of syntactic awareness, which is a type of metalinguistic awareness. Assessing two groups of children, aged 7-8 and 9-10 years, she found evidence that word reading accuracy and syntactic awareness share unique variance that is not explained by vocabulary and grammatical knowledge or memory.

Activities involving conscious levels of “meta” thought include self-dialogue, thinking aloud to clarify our reasoning, and to gain a better sense of our own understanding. It also includes conversations that elucidate our thoughts to others, including teachers, hopefully receiving a thoughtful response in reply. Teachers can encourage independent thought at times, but also prompt students to work together, teaching them to explain their thinking as they problem solve or create. Metacognitive processing is integral to learning, and especially to mastery levels of learning.   Unless the need for metacognitive processing exists, thoughts will not necessarily become conscious. The teacher must create the task that generates the need for metacognitive, metalinguistic thought. Many such tasks are described throughout Vocabulogic.




References:

Andrews, J. F., Yaden, D. B., & Templeton, S. (1986). Metalinguistic awareness and beginning literacy: Conceptualizing what it means to read and write. Portsmouth, N.H: Heinemann.

Cain, K. (2007). Syntactic awareness and reading ability: Is there any evidence for a special relationship? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 679-694.

Corson, D.J. (1984) The lexical bar: lexical change from 12 to 15 years measured by social class, region and ethnicity. British Educational Research Journal 10, 2: 115-133.

Donaldson, M. (1978). Children’s minds. Glasgow: Collins.

Duncan, L. G., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2009). Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 405-440.

Flavell, J. H. (1981) Cognitive Monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s Oral Communication (pp. 35-60). New York: Academic Press.

Gombert JE. Le développement métalinguistique. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France; 1990.

Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Nagy, W. E. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In R. K. Wagner, A. E Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52–77). New York: Guilford Press.

Pratt C, Grieve R. (1984). The development of metalinguistic awareness: An introduction. In Tunmer WE, Pratt C, Herriman ML (Ed.), Metalinguistic awareness in children (pp. 2–11). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Velag.

The Tahoe Guy, (Retrieved 2010).  Moon Over San Francisco. Licensed under Creative Commons. Cropped.

Zipke, M. (2011): First Graders Receive Instruction in Homonym Detection and Meaning Articulation: The Effect of Explicit Metalinguistic Awareness Practice on Beginning Readers. Reading Psychology, 32:4, 349-371.











Tuesday, November 8, 2016

Election Day 2016!

(Thank you for continuing to visit the site despite my absence. Note that I updated the archives link. The widget thingy had stopped working. For links to all posts, see "POSTS" under the picture of the Golden Gate Bridge, above.)

Just a reminder to go out and vote, and a few words about the Latin root LECT as in elect, electing, elected, election, electives, and the related words select, collect, dialect, etc.

Also, TED TALKS offers various perspectives on this election. See The Issues at Stake in the US Election of 2016.

Now for affixes and roots. This graphic is just something I put together for fun, but hopefully  it gets the point across. I expect there's plenty of creative expression going on in schools this week!


The prefix e- is an assimilated form of the well-known prefix ex-, meaning 'out, from'  We see it also in erase, emerge, evaporate, etc. So to elect is to 'choose from a group or pick out' or something of that sense. Harper's Online Etymology Dictionary is free to all. He describes the origins of election below. Notice the religious sense and the reading sense:
election (n.) c. 1300, "act of choosing someone to occupy a position, elevation to office" (whether by one person or a body of electors); also "the holding of a vote by a body of electors; the time and place of such a vote," from Anglo-French eleccioun, Old French elecion "choice, election, selection" (12c.), from Latin electionem (nominative electio), noun of action from past participle stem of eligere "pick out, select," from ex- "out" (see ex-) + -ligere, comb. form of legere "to choose, read" (see lecture (n.)). Theological sense "God's choice of someone" for eternal life is from late 14c. Meaning "act of choosing, choice" is from c. 1400.



Above is a more exhaustive look at the root LECT along with various forms and  interpretations, with oodles of relevant words. The screenshot is copied from Robertson's Word Info. Click on the link for MUCH more info. I cannot begin to imagine how long it took him to create this amazing reference tool. Notice that Robertson mentions the relationship between Latin and Greek. The Romans borrowed from the Greeks, so this is not surprising.


And...

Let's not forget the fun historical word snollygoster! I mentioned this before, but it's worth another look. Etymologist Mark Forsyth adds some humor to to the intensity of this election.  If the video doesn't play, go directly to the TED page.

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Mindful Zen of Morphology, revisited



We strolled the San Francisco wharf, stopping at the National Historic Park Maritime Museum and checking out the ships on the Hyde Street Pier. Near Aquatic Park we approached this refreshingly pungent tree.

Click the tree image. It will grow.

BIG ★ BIGGER BIGGEST

According to the Common Core State Standards, children in kindergarten and first grade must learn how common inflectional suffixes like -s, -ed, -ing, -er and -est create various forms of the same word, as with grow, grows, growing, and big, bigger, biggest.

But inflections are only the beginning. The inflectional suffix -er in greener and brighter is not the same as the derivational suffix -er in painter and preacher. (See The Slippery Suffix -er.)

By third grade, students need to be working with derived words, particularly those countless English words formed by adding a derivational suffix. (Read about suffixes.)

TREE ★ TREELET

Finding a semantic overlap  between tree and treelet is a matter of morphological problem solving (Anglin, 1993). This involves knowledge of prefixes and suffixes, and a readiness to seek similarities in form and meaning across words. It also involves analogy: "I know what  a piglet is, so I can guess what a treelet is." The ability to problem solve via analogies or morphemes is facilitated by knowledge of similar words: booklet, owlet, piglet, eaglet, and applet, a small computer application.

Eventually, if students are shown how to explore morphological connections and taught common prefixes and suffixes, they become more apt to seek that satisfying "ah-ha" moment, when word meanings click into place. It's often quite rewarding, like the snap of a puzzle piece. This moment is more likely to happen when students are reading, rather than listening.

BRIG ★ BRIGANTINE

Photographed at San Francisco National Maritime Museum
Along our walk we visited this fabulous -- and free -- museum. Of course, I began to wonder about these two words, given their close proximity on the display. My first thought was that the root brig might mean "ship"...

...but in addition to brig and brigantine, we have brigadier and brigade. Are they all part of the same family of words? (So then I thought the root meant either "ship" or 'to fight').

Asking the question is important. Coming up with an answer is secondary to asking the question. Are students asking the question? Are teachers modeling this habit of thought?

So!

In kindergarten, analyze words like big, bigger, and biggest (inflections).
Also analyze tip, tipping, and tipped (inflections).

By first grade, birdhouse, doghouse, and -- not quite the same pattern -- tree house (These are compound words, but notice a tree does not live in a tree house, unlike the birdhouse and doghouse examples. Also, a tree house is an open compound, rather than closed.)

Explore how meanings change in words derived from a known base: pig-piglet, owl-owlet, and tree-treelet.

Into middle school and beyond, address more complex derivations: brig, brigantine, brigand, brigadier, brigandage, etc. The word brig is perhaps a clip, a shortened form of brigantine. However, brig has developed a unique meaning over the years. By the way, according to Online Etymology Dictionary, the root does mean "to fight" (Middle English via Italian).

According to seminal research by Jeremy Anglin (1993), inferring word meaning via morphological reasoning predicts vocabulary growth. Anglin tested children in grades 1, 3, and 5, finding a sharp increase in word knowledge between grades 3 and 5. He suggested that this steep increase is largely due to increased awareness of the process of suffixation, in particular, the process of creating new words by adding derivational suffixes. Those students who were more skilled in this type of "morphological problem solving" performed comparatively better on the vocabulary test.

While root words (words that have no prefix or suffix attached, like shoe, rope, tree) accounted for the most words known by the average first grade student, derived words accounted for the most words known by a typical fifth grader.

The chart is from Anglin's monograph. His test included treelet, among other words. I added some color and the other forms of tree as examples only, providing an instance of each of the five types of words he included in the test: root words, inflected words, derived words, literal compounds, idioms.


In the years since Anglin's monograph, the relationship between linguistic insight and literacy has become a fairly hot topic in research circles. Not surprisingly, Berninger et al. (2010) found a similar linear relationship between vocabulary knowledge and morphological insight, in large part confirming Anglin's findings.

Promising research by Bauman et al. (2007) suggests that vocabulary increases as a result of a combined instructional focus that includes four components: 1) creating a language-rich learning environment, 2) providing explicit word instruction, 3) teaching word-learning strategies (including inferring meaning via morphological problem solving), and 4) fostering word consciousness. This line of inquiry is based on theories advanced by Graves (2006).  See the MCVIP post, where a large team of researchers describe even newer findings.

The more our vocabulary grows, the more we are able to make connections when practicing The Mindful Zen of Morphology. The more we make connections, the more our vocabulary grows.

References:

Anglin, J.M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(10), v-165. 


Baumann, J.F., Ware, D., & Edwards, E.C. (2007). “Bumping into spicy, tasty words that catch your tongue:” A formative experiment on vocabulary instruction. The Reading Teacher, 61(2), 108-122.

Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. (2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(2), 141-163.

Graves, M. F. (2006). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction. New York: Teachers College Press.
 
Nagy, W.E. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In R.K. Wagner, A.E Muse, & K.R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52-77). New York: Guilford Press. 



To be notified when a new post is published, enter your email address into Feedburner.
When Feedburner sends you a verification email, confirm to activate your subscription.

Sunday, March 3, 2013

"Sequestration" and the Complexity of Word Knowledge


Sequestration is upon us. Specific budget cuts will be announced, and for each nonexempt federal program, this will be carried out by some kind of Edward Sequester Hands. The incisions will be felt most by the unemployed and the furloughed, and I expect they won't be happy about it. In fact, the tune might go something like this:
It's sequestered we are, and sequestered we stay,
Till the debt is defrayed with the taxes we pay.
But we know it will take till the Reckoning Day.
The future's furloughed till the Reckoning Day.
The devil to pay till the Reckoning Day!

The sequester. Will it work? Hope so, but only time will tell. One positive outcome is already certain: Americans have been expanding their vocabulary. According to Google Trends constrained to the USA, interested folks have been "googling" definitions of sequestration and sequester, as the chart below shows (100 is peak search volume).


So, the nation is learning this word. However, in "Letting Sequester Fester" -- published in Word Routes  only 12 days ago -- linguist Ben Zimmer is a tad cautious:
"A bigger problem is that most people still don't know what sequester means; as Time's Katy Steinmetz noted, a poll in The Hill indicated that 25 percent of voters said that they didn't know what sequester referred to, while almost 40 percent guessed the wrong answer." (See poll results).
Ben's concern is well founded, at least in my case. Who knew sequestration had anything to do with spending? I did not, until recently. Prior to 2012,  the main context I had for sequester derived from movies like Runaway Jury and high profile court cases, where jurors are sequestered in hotel rooms lest they become tainted, bribed, biased.

In addition to the courtroom context, I may have happened upon sequester in a few other places. In the sports column for the Seattle Times:

"Outside of Daytona, teams are rarely sequestered at one track for five days"

In literature I may have run across Phillpotts (1920):

"Time rings his rounds and forgets not this sequestered hollow."

That's a beautiful line, and even memorable, but still I did not associate sequester with the economy. So how did I learn about fiscal sequestration? The same way we learn many words -- from a variety of context, supported by an accessible definition. Yes, I am among the "googlers" mentioned above. Now I know this other meaning of sequestration. I also know sequester, used as a verb, to sequester, and also as a noun, the sequester (the verb was only recently converted into a noun, through a process described in a prior post).

So what?


IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING

My own processing -- or learning -- of this word rather neatly flows with the five aspects of word complexity discussed in a chapter by vocabulary experts William Nagy and Judith Scott (2000). The five aspects that describe the complexity of word knowledge often overlap. All five aspects may not apply to every word.  According to the scholars, educators need to consider the following when teaching any given word:

1) Incrementality: As I have personally experienced with sequester, we do not immediately gain full understanding of a word meaning, but instead, we gradually and incrementally refine our knowledge, through various encounters with the concept, in varied context. As long as I only encountered sequester in the context of a jury, my grasp was limited. Teaching implications: Revisit words over time, in varied genres, applications, and uses. Provide for distributed practice. Avoid "vocabulary cramming" for a test.

2) Polysemy: Many words have more than one meaning, as we have seen with sequester. The most commonly used meaning is the one we are most likely to know. Teaching implications: Help students attend to context to grasp meaning. Explicitly teach multiple meanings. Teach dictionary use. Teach the metalinguistic notion that word meanings are flexible, and apt to change.

3. Multidimensionality: Words are learned along various dimensions. These dimensions may overlap.  Teaching implications: Help students pronounce the word, read it, spell it, use it correctly in terms of grammar and syntax.  Teach the conceptual meaning and its associations with other words, including morphological relationships, discussed below. Help students attend to collocations -- the words the target word "hangs out" with, including the little-noticed words: "in" sequestration, for one example. Discuss style and register. Sequestration is more formal than budget cuts and likely to be used in academic discourse. To develop a formal register within a discipline, try some of the "Accountable Talk" strategies discussed by Dr. Zygouris-Coe in a prior post.

Visual Thesaurus
4. Interrelatedness: Knowing one meaning actually implies that we know other related meanings. That should be more than evident with sequestration.  Teaching implications: Students are unlikely to understand budget sequestration unless they already understand the simple concepts of save and keep, and more abstract concepts, like reduce, withhold, percentage, budget, etc. Build on prior learning, and convey word relationships (synonyms, antonyms, derivations, conceptual or thematic clusters, etc.). Help students learn to use a dictionary and thesaurus, to further deepen their understanding.

5. Heterogenity: Words vary in complexity, and so do word learners. The content word sequestration is more complex than the content term budget cuts, and far more complex than the function word within. Teaching implications: Provide differentiated instruction, depending on the word, and depending on the learner.

MORPHOLOGICAL REASONING

Learning about how words are formed with roots and affixes is part of developing metalinguistic insight, and as such, it promotes both vocabulary and comprehension. Because vocabulary growth hinges on an understanding of word structure, Nagy and Scott (2000) claim the following, in the same chapter discussed above:

 "It is hard to overstate the importance of morphology in vocabulary growth" (p. 275)

With sequester, older students could explore the family of words that flow from the Latin root, which means something like, 'to place in safe keeping' (see Robertson).  Partners could discuss the semantic overlap across these morphologically related words and analyze the word structure to see how the different suffixes and prefixes, smacked onto the root, modify the meaning and/or grammatical word class (noun, verb, adjective, or adverb).
sequester     sequestration     sequestrator     sequestrate     sequestral   
sequestrant     sequestrable      unsequestrable     unsequestered 

Sequestrate words in isolated study lists? Not sound practice. Provide some context and a student-friendly definition. Explore morphological families of words.

Work together with a peer, practicing how to pronounce difficult words. Like sequestration. Now that's a tricky one. A tongue twister. Gain confidence and competence. Then use the word in formal, academic discourse.

I've been sequestered in my office long enough. Best wishes, until next time.


References:
Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume II (pp. 269–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.


To be notified when a new post is published, enter your email address into Feedburner.
When Feedburner sends you a verification email, confirm to activate your subscription.

Sunday, February 3, 2013

Getting "In" to Prefixes


Greetings! This month, I wrote a guest post titled Getting "in" to Prefixes for Visual Thesaurus/Vocabulary.com.  If interested, see link below.

But first, stay a while and browse. Scroll down for a few posts, dig into the archives (see links above), read an entry from a guest author (see links in sidebar), or explore the dozens of websites listed at the bottom of the page.

Getting "in" to Prefixes may seem familiar, because I have expanded upon an older post. The extended article includes a discussion of academic words beginning with the prefix in-, (e.g., inflammable, incandescent, and invaluable), an interactive sorting activity (download the page and freely distribute), and pertinent Common Core State Standards for English / Language Arts.

Enjoy!

Sunday, June 10, 2012

The Underestimated Verb and Morphological Reasoning

To be notified when a new post is published, enter your email address into Feedburner. When Feedburner sends you a verification email, confirm to activate your subscription.


I discuss verbs, including the verb-forming suffixes -ize, -ify, -ate,and -en, the verb-forming prefixes be-,  en-/em- and sometimes de-, and verbs that started life as a noun and underwent grammatical shift, as in table/ to table. 

In a Web search, I found that Amazon can "betterize" their recommendations, someone “argufied somethin’ fierce,” and someone else is "preparing to speechify." The Exploratorium addresses the psychology behind how to cute-ify any creature, simply by making the eyes bigger, the body plump or fluffy, etc.

Action verbs advance the plot, in life and in literature. Only the verb can stand alone as a complete sentence: "Go!" But verbs can be the very devil. In each instance below, the verb went awry:
  • “How do you know if you don’t measure if you have a system that simply suckles kids through?”
  •  “You know, this issue doesn’t seem to resignate with the people.”
  • “They have misunderestimated me.”
(Bushisms, Weisberg, 2001)

How many English words are verbs? While nouns and adjectives make up 75% of the words in the English language, verbs only account for about 14%, according to Oxford Dictionaries.com (estimates only, based on main entry words).

However, this estimate does not take into account words with senses for different word classes (nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc.). For example, snowplow is tallied as a noun, but it could also be tallied as a verb: “I will snowplow the driveway.” Thus, the estimate of 14%, or only 1 in 7 words, must be quite low, because converting a noun into a verb is fairly common in English (not necessarily true in every language).

The business of transforming a noun into a verb goes by many names: verbing, verbification, morphological conversion, grammatical shift, functional shift, zero-derivation, etc. Whatever we call it, one thing is certain: It provides for a great deal of versatility and flexibility of expression. If Oxford’s tally of verbs included multiple senses for each given main entry, the number of verbs in the English language would rise, significantly. 

And even though it is possible to convert words across grammatical categories, as from an adjective (green) into a noun (the putting green), verbing is by far the most common type of grammatical shift.

In “You’ve Been Verbed” Anthony Gardner writes: “Mothers and fathers used to bring up children: now they parent. Critics used to review plays: now they critique them. Athletes podium, executives flipchart, and almost everybody Googles. Watch out—you’ve been verbed.” (Update: Also see 10-27-2012 NYT post by Dr. Helen Sword, Mutant Verbs).

Nonetheless, there is some logic to the pie graph pictured above, despite the missing grammatical conversions. It is not surprising that nouns and adjectives outnumber verbs. We can apply one verb to a slew of nouns. For example, the possibilities are endless with the verb fix. Theoretically, we can "fix" any noun that exists!

How does morphology help us understand verbs?
Source: Vocabulary Through Morphemes (Ebbers)
Sentence order helps us understand grammatical function. In addition to sentence order, suffixes--and some prefixes--provide syntactic information. For example, words that end with –ize tend to be verbs, as in verbalize. Words that end with –ion tend to be abstract nouns, as in education and television. Words that end with –ic tend to be adjectives, as in exotic, heroic. The chart shows derivations of drama, formed by adding various suffixes. Read more about derivational suffixes.

When there is no verb-forming suffix, for example when the noun table is transformed to a verb, "Let's table the discussion" we must rely on sentence order to determine word class. Read more about words with multiple meanings, including suffix-less zero-derivations).

How is a verb formed, morphologically? A verb could be a morphologically simple word, with only one morpheme: run, eat, sleep. It could be morphologically complex, composed of more than one morpheme. This includes compound words that are verbs: downsize, whitewash, kickbox. A handful of derivational suffixes create verbs. I list them below.
  • -ate, as in evaporate, calculate, demonstrate (more words)
  • -ize, as in analyze, revitalize, theorize (more words)
  • -ise (the British spelling for –ize) as in exercise
  • -ify, as in justify, oversimplify, pacify, electrify (more from Word Detector)
  • -en, as in moisten, sharpen, shorten (but not earthen, silken, etc.)

Prefixes can form verbs, too. The prefix en- creates verbs like endanger, enjoy, endear. This prefix is also spelled em-, as in embody, empower (see post on assimilated prefixes). Adding the prefix be- transforms a noun to a verb, as in befriend, bewitch, besiege. The prefix de- sometimes forms verbs, as in derail, defrost, and dethrone.

Reading research, morphological insight, and verbs: Researchers use contextualized (and sometimes isolated) invented words that contain real derivational suffixes to see whether or not older children (and adults) understand, even just subconsciously, how the derivational suffix indicates grammatical category. I have used the same process in my dissertation work, using real words and also invented words. Two examples from my test wordPLAY are shown below:

Can the rain ___?   vapor         vaporize      vapors         vaporizing 

We will ____ it.       borkize       borkous      borkment      borkly

Researchers have consistently found that poor morphological insight explains poor vocabulary knowledge: After all the other usual suspects have been accounted for, there is still a difference between students of high versus low vocabulary, and that remaining difference is partially explained when we factor in morphological knowledge. This difference begins in the primary grades and continues through high school and college for some students (e.g., Berninger et al. 2010; Carlisle, 2000; 2010; McBride-Chang et al., 2005, etc.; Singson, Mahony, & Mann, 2000, etc.).

What should students do? Learn words? YES! But also, learn ABOUT words--how they work, how they are formed, how to play around with them. And READ. And TALK. Absorb words, and their patterns. 

That's all. It's summer, almost. It's Sunday, spot on. Why not go outside and verb?

PS. Read more about the suffix -ify in Don't Be Iffy on -ify and see the worksheet that goes with it. Also see Teaching Verbs and Confronting the Skunk, by Georgia Scurletis, at Visual Thesuaurs.

References

Sunday, May 13, 2012

Videos of Structured Word Inquiry (Bowers)

Peter Bowers contributed the following post. Pete is a doctoral candidate at Queen's University, Canada, with expertise in orthography and morphology, as well as critical thinking. He has investigated how morphological awareness contributes to various aspects of literacy, especially spelling and vocabulary knowledge. As a regular contributor to Vocabulogic, Pete has authored several posts, including Structured Word Inquiry and Meta-Analysis of Morphological Intervention Studies.  Visit Pete's website: WordWorks Literacy Centre.

Current research has converged on the finding that literacy instruction should address morphology from the beginning of instruction and that this is especially important for less able students (Bowers, Kirby & Deacon, 2010; Carlisle, 2010; Goodwin & Ahn, 2010; Reed, 2008). 
Given this evidence, the question facing educators and researches is not whether we should teach morphology, but how to teach it. 
Structured word inquiry (Bowers & Kirby, 2010) is an instructional approach that targets exactly this goal. I regularly receive anecdotal reports from teachers and tutors reporting examples of this effect, such as this account of a student-led investigation of the word condensation. As well, our controlled intervention study using this approach (Bowers & Kirby, 2010) showed that morphological instruction using the structured word inquiry approach brought significant vocabulary gains for words that were not explicitly taught, but which shared a base with explicitly taught words.
It is a challenge to explain what structured word inquiry is clearly and to convey how it operates in classrooms in writing. For that  reason, I am delighted that Susan has invited me to share a few videos that provide a big picture of this instruction and which illustrate this instruction in action in real classrooms. 
  • This public lecture on structured word inquiry provides a useful "big picture" of this instruction. The video is from a talk I gave for the J.P.Das Centre on Developmental and Learning Disabilities at the University of Alberta.




  • This video shows an investigation of the spelling of the word does in an elementary classroom.


  • This video shows a lesson introducing the central linguistic tools of structured word inquiry, the morphological word sum and matrix to a kindergarten class.


To explore other videos illustrating this instruction in action in classrooms around the world, visit this YouTube channel. 
My hope is that these videos will motivate Vocabulogic readers to have a go at morphological analysis using matrices and word sums. There are many free resources available at www.wordwordskingston.com to help you get started.  
At this link, you will learn about a new piece of software called The Word Microscope (that is currently free to download) that you can use to start these types of investigations on your own and with your students. 
You may also be interested in the Teacher Resource Book based on the Bowers and Kirby (2010) intervention and the Word Works Summer Courses. Also consider joining my live on-line broadcast on “Structured Word Inquiry and the Scientific Study of Words” on Lexercise on June 14th. 


Finally, if I were to recommend one article that lays out the underlying principles of how English spelling works that are revealed through structured word inquiry with the matrix and the word sum, it would be Carol Chomsky's seminal 1970 paper, "Reading, writing, and phonology" in Harvard Educational Review.
References 

Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. (2010).Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 141–163.

Bowers, P. N., & Kirby, J. R. (2010). Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 515–537.

Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179.

Carlisle, F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 464–487.

Chomsky, C. (1970). Reading, writing, and phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 4(2), 287–309.

Goodwin, A.P., & Ahn, S., (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 183-208.

Reed, D.K. (2008). A synthesis of morphology interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in grades K–12. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(1), 36–49.